Recent events in the Middle East have once again led to increased concerns about the impact that World events can exert on global financial markets. In such times, it is important to remain focused on the long-term trend, and to try and avoid taking short-term decisions that could prove detrimental, as history tells us that the initial knee-jerk reaction to global events is often short lived.
Why markets react to conflict
It is true to say that investment markets crave certainty at all times. Calm waters allow investors to focus on the prospects for the global economy and individual companies, without the need to consider the disruptive impact of global events, such as major conflict. One of the key reasons why recent conflicts have caused consternation from an investment perspective is the potential impact on commodity prices. For example, as Middle Eastern nations are key players in the global oil market, heightened tension in the region has the potential to force oil prices higher. Likewise, the Russian invasion of Ukraine caused a significant spike in natural gas prices, due to supply shortages.
What history tells us
Looking back through history provides clear evidence that investor pain following a global event is relatively short-lived.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 led to a fall in global markets, as inflationary pressure rapidly increased and caused investors to re-think economic projections. Despite reacting calmly to the initial outbreak of hostilities, the S&P500 index of leading US stocks moved decisively lower a few weeks later, and took just over one year to recover to a higher level than at the start of the Russian invasion 1. For those investors who correctly took a longer-term view, this period of uncertainty will now be little more than a memory, as the S&P500 now sits relatively close to new all-time highs.
Other major conflicts and acts of terrorism have caused a sharper short-term market reaction, which then quickly corrects once markets have had time to assess the impact. Following the suspension of global markets in the wake of 9/11 attacks in 2001, the S&P500 index fell over 11% in the space of seven trading sessions, as investors digested the US reaction and potential impact on economic prospects 1. The downturn was, however, very short-lived, as by October 12th 2001, the S&P500 had recovered the ground lost immediately following the terror attack and, indeed, ended the year a further 5% higher 1.
It’s not just war
Of course, geopolitical risk does not necessarily increase as a result of conflict. The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic created the largest global economic crisis for a generation, as lockdowns caused significant damage to public finances and global commerce. Between April and June 2020, UK Gross Domestic Product fell by a record 20.3% during this period, only to rebound by 16.8% in the following three months, as the country slowly emerged from the first wave of lockdowns 2.
Investors had nowhere to hide during the early stages of the pandemic, with stock markets around the World moving rapidly lower during March and April 2020. The S&P500 index fell by 29% from 1st January 2020 to the low point on 23rd March 2020, but had recovered to stand higher than at the start of the year by the end of July, just four months later 1.
Many investors will vividly recall the unprecedented sense of concern at the time of the Covid-19 outbreak, and the economic damage to public finances around the World will take many years to repair. Global Equities markets, however, corrected rapidly once the initial panic had subsided and investors began looking at the fundamental recovery in business confidence and economic performance to follow.
Climate related events also have the potential to be a greater source of concern to investors over years to come. The changing weather patterns and increase in extreme weather events have the potential to reduce economic output and cause widespread damage, including disruption to supplies of raw materials, food and energy. Our view is that climate related risk may also prove to be an opportunity for those industries who are able to adapt, and the impact of such changes could be far more gradual over a number of years than the immediate impact of conflict or other global events.
Why markets bounce back
As demonstrated by recent precedents, global markets tend to be resilient and often shrug off an initial overreaction to unexpected global events. Once the initial shock of the event has subsided, investors are able to take a measured view of the impact on corporate earnings and economic growth, with markets often rebounding quickly following an initial sell-off. One of the primary reasons why this may be the case is that central banks can invoke a monetary policy response, and Governments can provide fiscal stimulus, which can boost investor confidence. It is also often the case that the global event will do little to damage future corporate earnings, although of course depending on the nature of the event, some sectors of the economy may be more adversely affected than others.
Keep the long-term view in mind
When investing in Equities, it is vital to focus on the longer term objectives. Equity markets are volatile, and from time to time, global events push risk levels higher and can cause periods of underperformance. Whilst we cannot predict the future, we can learn from the market’s reaction to past events, and it is evident that markets often rebound shortly after the initial shock of a global event has passed. Even a once in a generation event (we hope…) such as the Covid-19 pandemic, only caused markets to retreat temporarily. Comparing index values today to the depressed levels seen in March 2020, is a potent reminder of the need to remain calm and stay invested through turbulent times.
It is at times of major concern that the ongoing advice of an independent financial adviser can prove invaluable, both to provide reassurance and remind you of the need to focus on the longer term objective. Speak to one of our friendly team to start a conversation about your financial planning requirements.
Sources:
1 FE Analytics
2 Office for National Statistics